Încă o dată s-a dovedit că Stalin a avut dreptate. Într-un district cu un singur votant care l-a ales pe Sanders, a câștigat … Hillary Clinton ! Poftim de mai înțelege ceva … maia les dacă voturile se numără ,,electronic“.
Jennifer Jacobs, jejacobs@dmreg.com Keane Schwarz is certain he knows the outcome of the vote in his precinct: He was the lone caucusgoer in Woodbury County No. 43.
But the Iowa Democratic Party’s final results state that Hillary Clinton won one county delegate and Bernie Sanders received zero.
“I voted for Bernie,” Schwarz, 36, of Oto, told The Des Moines Register. “It was really suspicious … I’m actually pretty irate about it.”
Some complaints that Iowa Democrats have shared with the Register about discrepancies in caucus results appear to be valid. Others stem from confusion over how the math-heavy delegate-awarding system works in the Democrats’ caucus process.
Related: Uproar could lead to revamping Democratic caucuses
Party officials on Friday night were still reviewing reports and correcting errors and hadn’t yet shared candidates’ updated totals of state delegate equivalents, which determine the winner of the caucuses.
Sanders’ backers are more likely than Clinton’s to think the political system is rigged, polling has found. So it might not come as a surprise, especially since he lost by a hairsbreadth, that some think the Democratic caucus system is rigged. It also doesn’t help the optics that the state party chairwoman drove around for years in a car with “HRC2016” license plates.
Several caucusgoers told the Register they thought Sanders had been shorted county delegates, including in Knoxville No. 3.
Categories: Articole de interes general
Barzilaiendan 
“It also doesn’t help the optics that the state party chairwoman drove around for years in a car with “HRC2016” license plates.”
Oh my, in this case Stalin was right 🙂