I’ve seen it a lot too. Piper:
“Not feeling loved and not being loved are not the same. Jesus loved all people well. And many did not like the way he loved them. Was David’s zeal for the Lord imbalanced because his wife Michal despised him for it? Was Job’s devotion to the Lord inordinate because his wife urged him to curse God and die? Would Gomer be a reliable witness to Hosea’s devotion? . . . I have seen so much emotional blackmail in my ministry I am jealous to raise a warning against it. Emotional blackmail happens when a person equates his or her emotional pain with another person’s failure to love. They aren’t the same. A person may love well and the beloved still feel hurt, and use the hurt to blackmail the lover into admitting guilt he or she does not have. Emotional blackmail says, ‘If I feel hurt by you, you are guilty.’ There is no defense. The hurt person has become God. His emotion has become judge and jury. Truth does not matter. All that matters is the sovereign suffering of the aggrieved. It is above question. This emotional device is a great evil. I have seen it often in my three decades of ministry and I am eager to defend people who are being wrongly indicted by it.”
Categories: Articole de interes general
Tudor Arghezi: „Împărțită pe secole, Istoria e un bîlci și un balamuc” « cristoiublog.ro
In ciuda criticilor aduse de Sean Michael Lucas, nu cumva Tozer a implinit Luca 14:26:
„Dacă vine cineva la Mine, şi nu urăşte pe tatăl său, pe mama sa, pe nevasta sa, pe copiii săi, pe fraţii săi, pe surorile sale, ba chiar însăşi viaţa sa, nu poate fi ucenicul Meu.”??
cat despre defectul de a fi neospitalier (plus atribuirea a multe pacate de catre Tim Challies), ridica oarecare semne de intrebare… si totusi?
Pana acum Tozer mi se parea unul dintre “cei mai…”… ramane asa, in ciuda defectelor sale…